Gun Control in the USA Inconsistency, Irrationality and Improbability

Introduction The right for carrying weapons is, perhaps, one of the most controversial issues on the civil agenda of the present-day United States (Vermick wet al. 2021). While there is a strong belief that the prohibition to carry weapons or use them for the purposes of self defense in some way induces safety among the residents of the United States, statistics shows that banning armed weapons from use does not solve the problem.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Control in the USA: Inconsistency, Irrationality and Improbability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More More to the point, banning firearms from use seems to conflict with the basic principles of the U.S. Constitution. Most importantly, prohibiting guns from use does not affect the outbursts of violence within the country; while the given law serves as a means to hush down the problem without actually considering the factors that have caused it. Thesis St atement Gun regulation is a consistent source of debate within the United States, with advocates on either side unwilling to budge in their position; but regulation is merely treating the symptoms of the real issue. Argument 1 The proponents of the law banning guns often mention the fact that the prohibition of firearms from being used by average citizens reduces crime rates in the state, as it will be displayed later. However, what most of the people providing the given argument forget is the fact that anti-gun laws do not, in fact, contribute to making people less violent; instead, they merely increase the distance between the victim and the aggressor (Blocher 121). Argument 2 When it comes to the discussion of weapons banning, one should also bring the following fact to people’s attention: state authorities are concerned with the safety of the U.S. citizens and the possibility of a trauma or an injury as a result of using an automatic gun. Therefore, when it comes to semia utomatic weapons, state authorities should consider providing people with the opportunity to use weapons in order to protect themselves. Argument 3 Eventually, the resolution provided by the Supreme Court must be mentioned in defense of the use of firearms, no pun intended. This has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word â€Å"fraud† on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. Now just look at those words. There are only three lines to that amendment. A â€Å"well-regulated militia†? if the militia, which was going to be the state army, was going to be well regulated, why shouldn’t 16 and 17 and 18 or any other age persons be regulated in the use of arms the way an automobile is regulated. (Fareed para. 14; Burger para. 10)Advertising Looking for essay on administrative law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The line drawn betwee n an average citizen and the â€Å"well-regulated militia† (Casteen 210) should, therefore, be considered as another gap in the U.S. state law regarding firearms. Counterargument On a second thought, the current policy regarding gun control on the territory of the United States has a quite legitimate point. The current sanctions against firearms admittedly affect the rates of violent crime in a number of states. Comparing the statistical data regarding the outbreaks of violence in different parts of the United States before and after the passing the law that prohibits carrying guns, one will inevitably find out that the number of armed robberies, as well as accidents related to gunshot wounds, have been reduced impressively from 780 to 490 per year (Kennesaw Police Department para. 1). The statistics provided above shows in a very graphic way that, when having little to no access to firearms, people do not usually seek the means to obtain them and, therefore, do not use them in case of a conflict. As a result, the number of exchanges of fire between the people involved in organized crime, as well as the amount of instances of armed resistance to police and the injuries in cases of armed resistance, are brought down a few notches. Rebuttal While the statistics shown above is quite impressive, it should be mentioned that, along with the reduction of armed robberies, a steep rise in the use of cold weapons in robberies and rampages could be observed. In addition, the fact that people are banned from carrying guns in most states of America does not prevent them from using firearms in public places: â€Å"With just one exception, every public mass shooting in the USA since 1950 has taken place where citizens are banned from carrying guns† (A Factual Look at Guns in America para. 4). More to the point, the fact that some of the U.S. states, such as Georgia, introduced more liberal principles of bearing arms by passing the Mandatory Gun Law, the number of armed robberies dropped by nearly unbelievable 89% (Hamilton and Burch para. 7).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Gun Control in the USA: Inconsistency, Irrationality and Improbability specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Despite the fact that the law obliges every single dweller of the city to carry a gun, not only is the crime rate within the city reduced impressively, but also a number of potential crimes have been prevented, according to the official statistics (Levine et al. 7). As the state’s official statistics show, compared to the rest of the cities in the county, Kennesaw maintains a relatively stable and very low crime rate, with only 576.7 crimes committed per year on average during 2002–2012 (Kennesaw Police Department para. 2) When it comes to counterarguments against the use of firearms by ordinary citizens, the fact that the right to bear arms is guaranteed to the U.S. citizens by the Constitution is often overlooked. Indeed, according to the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the U.S. residents do have the right to own guns and use them – though, initially, the possession of firearms presupposed that they should be used for hunting purposes: â€Å"the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions, and as allowed by Law† (IV. The English Bill of Rights and the Present Controversy [131]). It is also remarkable that what initially was supposed to be â€Å"for their common Defence† was swiftly changed into â€Å"their Defence† right before the Second Amendment was to come into force; the given detail shows that the concept of personal defense was stretched beyond the idea of fighting for one’s right to live and embraced the idea of maintaining personal safety (Glanz and Annas 2360). Therefore, it can be assumed that banning any kind of firearms in general and gu ns in particular does not solve the actual problem; to be more exact, laws against carrying guns do not address the problem that forces people to fend for themselves with the help of firearms; instead, these laws serve as a means to block the symptoms of the problem from taking place, instead of addressing the problem itself and attacking the factors that cause it (Cantor 506). Indeed, taking a closer look at the problem of the use of guns, one will notice that, for the most part, people refer to high crime rates within the state to prove their point. Therefore, it is much more reasonable to consider making semiautomatic firearms use legal as a sensible compromise. Works Cited IV. The English Bill of Rights and the Present Controversy. n. d. Web. Blocher, Joseph. â€Å"Firearm Localism.† Yale Law Journal 123.1 (2012), 121.Advertising Looking for essay on administrative law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Burger, Warren. MacNeil-Lehrer News Hour Charlayne Hunter-Gault. 21 December 1991. Interview. Cantor, Julie D. â€Å"Bracing for the Impact of Expanded Second Amendment Rights.† The New England Journal of Medicine 363.6 (2009), 506–508. Casteen, John. â€Å"Ditching the Rubric on Gun Control.† Virginia Quarterly Review (2004): 210-221. Hamilton, Jonathan and David Burch. Gun Ownership – It’s The Law In Kennesaw. n. d. Web. Glanz, Leonard H. and George G. Annas. â€Å"Handguns, Health, and the Second Amendment.† The New England Journal of Medicine 360.22 (2009), 2360–2365. Kennesaw Police Department. 4, January, 2013. Web. Levine, Robert S. et al. â€Å"Firearms, Youth Homicide, and Public Health.† Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 23.1 (2012), 7–19. Vermick, Jon et al. â€Å"Changing the Constitutional Landscape for Firearms: the US Supreme Court’s recent Second Amendment Decisions.† Ameri can Journal for Public Health 101.11 (2011), 2021–2026. This essay on Gun Control in the USA: Inconsistency, Irrationality and Improbability was written and submitted by user Anabella Sharpe to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Plato and Aristotles Belief About Happiness †Philosophy Essay

Plato and Aristotles Belief About Happiness – Philosophy Essay Free Online Research Papers Plato and Aristotles Belief About Happiness Philosophy Essay Happiness is a desirable state for man, a state which for the philosophies of Plato and Aristotle, can be achieved through possessing good things. Plato states that â€Å"a lover of good things has a desire †¦ that they become his own. That’s what makes people happy, isn’t it possessing good things (Five Dialogues, 50).† Acquisition of gold and silver, or honors and offices in the city may seem to lead to happiness, but Plato does not consider them good if they are not gained â€Å"by justice or moderation or piety or some other part of virtue (Five Dialogues, 68). In this regard, Plato and Aristotle are in agreement as to what form of good most directly leads to happiness, virtue. Aristotle suggests that â€Å"We always pursue honor, pleasure, wisdom, and all the virtues, both for their own sakes and for the sake of happiness, since we think we shall attain happiness by means of them. (Philosophy of Aristotle, 321) And here as with Plato we are in pursuit of that which makes us happy, we must attempt to make the good our own. The search for the good is necessitated by the fact that we are born without it. â€Å"It is quite plain that none of the moral virtues is produced in us by nature †¦ They come to be because we are fitted by nature to receive them; but we perfect them by training or habit (Philosophy of Aristotle, 334).† We can become morally virtuous then, and thereby happy, through the habituation of moral practices. It is in the question of how one becomes morally sound that the philosophies of Aristotle and Plato diverge. Whereas Aristotle gives us a training routine for attaining what we do not have, Plato abstracts the concept of virtue to an eternal form that can be achieved through love. â€Å"A man or anyone else who has a desire desires what is not at hand and not present, what he does not have, and what he is not, and that of which he is in need; for such are the objects of desire and love (Symposium, 43). The man who lacks virtue desires to have it, and through love can com e to know virtue in its true form. But before we analyze the distinct methods that these philosophers proscribe for the attainment of virtue, it is critical that we understand how they define virtue itself. The split in a method for achieving moral virtue is predicated on the very different definitions given it by Plato and Aristotle, definitions which are erected on the foundation laid by Socrates. Socrates believed that virtue was a concept unknown to man, yet widely regarded by men as easily defined. He methodically sought out those who claimed expertise on the subject of virtue and showed them to be deficient. And while Socrates was able to prove others incomplete in their knowledge, he also lacked a definition of virtue himself. But he claimed to be wiser â€Å"to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know (Five Dialogues, 26).† In knowing that he did not know, Socrates enables the concept of virtue to be reevaluated. His philosophy becomes the precondition for the work of Plato and Aristotle, in that a definition of virtue would not be required if an acceptable one already existed. Plato is the first to put forth a new definition, using our understan ding of geometry as a reference point. Research Papers on Plato and Aristotle's Belief About Happiness - Philosophy EssayComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoHonest Iagos Truth through DeceptionRelationship between Media Coverage and Social andBringing Democracy to AfricaQuebec and CanadaOpen Architechture a white paperEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenResearch Process Part OneThe Project Managment Office SystemThe Effects of Illegal Immigration

Production Possibility Frontier Worksheet Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Production Possibility Frontier Worksheet - Essay Example The points A, B, and C represents the most efficient use of the resources in the production industry. The Point X denotes an inefficient use of resources. The point Y on the other hand denotes the production state that cannot be achieved at the current state (Riley). Improvement in technology for the production of consumer goods makes the production of consumer goods cheaper to the producer. The improvement in technology shifts the PPF graph outwards. Consequently, the production of consumer goods has shifted outwards. Improvement in technology for the production of consumer goods makes the production of consumer goods cheaper to the producer. The improvement in technology shifts the PPF outwards. Consequently, the production of consumer goods has shifted outwards. In reading through the crusades of progress i get the impression that the author tries to justify human actions. I strongly agree with the first paragraph that there is sufficient reason for the existence of evil in the world because evil works some good in us. For example one day I got beat up while walking at night. This experience taught me that I should stay at home with my family during night times. This has helped me greatly as it has strengthened my family. I personally feel that that human nature can be best understood through history. Punishment on the other hand does not serve any good. This is best illustrated by the many ills in the society despite the harsh punishment that the offenders serve. Indeed Beccaria postulated the best passage on the crimes and punishments. Punishment is also not always just. The best example is the case of the Condorcet who committed suicide due to loopholes in the justice system. He was accused of being anti-revolution. The pain was too much for him to bear such that he saw it better for him to die. I also acknowledge his contribution in philosophy. I get this from where the essay says that he argued that human nature could be perfected